Is consciousness fundamental reddit. Unconscious matter can't give rise to subjective consciousness experience. Again, why not? It's no different than the fundamental nature of time, wave/particle duality, spooky action at a distance, the origin of the cosmos, or metaphysical uncertainty These are all aspects of the more basic and inexplicable ineffability of being, and the people who endeavor to contemplate consciousness on a supposedly intellectual or analytic basis phenomenal consciousness: the concept that it feels like something to be something Ah. Phenomenal Consciousness ('P-Consciousness') is the raw feeling of experiencing. For discussion of the scientific study of consciousness, as well as related philosophy. However, the sublation is never 100%, the two-sidedness is revealed by the apparent dualism in the word that see reality separated due to a necessary relativity. Within the expansive framework of a Unified Theory of Everything, consciousness emerges not as a mere by product of complex interactions but as a fundamental property of the universe, akin to mass, charge, or space-time. I think its super important differentiate the theories of space-time with the existence of a reality outside our mind. Here you will find news, updates, theories and evidence related to Aliens, UFOs, Fringe Science, Consciousness and OBEs, Cryptids, Poltergeists, and any anomalous data/experiences people may have for independent and open-minded scientific analysis! Reddit's premier debate venue for the evolution versus creationism controversy. Whatever the implications of this are, it has to do with our mind is and what we can do with it. The brain has evolved as a part of the nerve system to process sensory data and to prepare and coordinate actions. It's neural pathways firing off in different parts of the brain. All is consciousness. It just sucks that we don't know something so fundamental. Yet, its fundamental nature, the 'water,' remains unaltered whether it is in the ocean, a river, or isolated as a droplet. Consequently, this sometimes leads to individuals talking past one another since they are using the term "consciousness" differently. Hence consciousness is more fundamental than awareness, if looked at from that perspective. Why does the consciousness of an organism depend on the proper function of the brain? If consciousness is a fundamental aspect of reality, then it may be important to ensure that AI systems are designed and used in a way that is respectful of this reality. 2. currently, we lack a physical explanation for the existence of consciousness. Indeed, the UE equation recognizes this fundamental fact, it is part of the equation. ill have to read into that, as far im concerned consciousness is just the product of our brain processing information from our senses. I like panpsychism (which I would distinguish from idealism), and I hate it when people (including many panosyciats) say that panpsychism means that consciousness is fundamental. It's idealism; mind/conscuouness is the fundamental reality. Yeah, pretty much. Panpsychists, on the other hand, treat phenomenal consciousness to be fundamental intrinsic feature of fundamental elements of physics -- thus, phenomenal consciousness per se never truly emerge, only complex structured variants of it emerge based on different neurophysiological arrangements. TL;DR: Premise: Consciousness is a fundamental force of the universe, language is the medium through which it travels and our brains are simply tapping into a universal consciousness rather than generating our own separate consciousnesses, like an a laptop picking up a Wi-Fi signal. One consciousness is a contradiction in what individuals talk about with experiences. Look into ‘Conscious Realism’. American scientist Robert Lanza, MD explained why death does not exist: he believes that consciousness is a fundamental property of the universe, and that death is just an illusion created by the linear perception of time. Existence feels a certain way and that is all. And brain dead organisms who are surviving are conscious but not self conscious. It’s some random facts that seem related to consciousness. To me consciousness comes before things. Consciousness is one of the ideas which has baffled best of best biologists. mosified gravity: no new stuff, but you modify existing fundamental laws. Consciousness is fundamental : Pretty 103K subscribers in the samharris community. Jan 14, 2020 · According to panpsychism, consciousness pervades the universe and is a fundamental feature of it. People with intellectual disabilities and split-brain patients are good examples of this. The weird part is that this does not appear to even be arguing that an individual's consciousness exists prior to life or after death. The research suggests that consciousness might have a tangible structure rooted in quantum processes within the brain’s microtubules, challenging previous assumptions about the incompatibility of quantum coherence with the brain’s environment. With your brain dying, you die, but there would still be an expriencing subject, but it wouldn't be the you that you know right now as aJrenalin, for example. All that ever was and ever will be is here now. A significant problem is that there's no consensus on what constitutes "true consciousness" amongst neuroscientists and philosophers of mind. Consciousness is fundamental. " - Erwin Schrödinger • "Consciousness is never experienced in the plural, only in the singular. Essentially the entire universe may have a single consciousness that is as fundamental as the speed of light, gravity, the strong and weak If consciousness is a fundamental property of our universe, why is it localised to brains? When a brain is damaged, its organism's consciousness is affected. I for one say consciousness is fundamental as the fundamental state of the very small: r/quantum_consciousness Is consciousness everywhere? Is it fundamental? Is it emergent? Is panpsychism true? If so, then is suffering inevitable? If so, then what intensity? Just what makes suffering possible in physics is an important question for ethics and Efilism, since consciousness is the seat of value. On panpsychism you could say consciousness is fundamental. Consciousness may continue after death, because if we are part of a unified consciousness, then this consciousness would continue when the physical aspects of our existence end. Thank you Accomplished-Boat360 for posting on r/consciousness, below are some general reminders for the OP and the r/consciousness community as a whole. The whole topic of consciousness inspires so much nonsense, even from highly educated people. So the Once you're ready, you are able to let go of your ego momentarily, to re-experience the wholeness of being one. Consciousness came before life. This revolutionary view posits that consciousness, akin to gravity or electromagnetism, forms a basic building block of reality. This is not at all an understanding of consciousness. As it stands, it doesn't. Just because consciousness is a ubiquitous component of our experiences, it doesn't mean that consciousness is a fundamental component of the universe; it merely means that consciousness is a fundamental component of our perception of the universe. 52K subscribers in the consciousness community. It could merely be the nature of existence. It's the movie that plays inside you. stanford - Consciousness. This is somewhat analogous to the combination problem in panpsychism. " - Erwin Schrödinger • "Consciousness is not a thing or a substance, but a process. The fundamental status of consciousness is necessary for Science to be the means by which universal theories are identified and observed. The sense of an individuated self that you experience is a reduction of the fundamental force of consciousness. if you cut the bloodflow to the brain like choking someone out they always lose consciousness. The universe being fundamental consciousness as viewed from our perspective, and life is(are?), dissociations of that fundamental consciousness. Saying that a "perspective vector" is a "fundamental force" is literally meaningless. " With that being true, it stands to reason that the laws of physics should bend to the will of consciousness, and there would be no reason for consciousness to be limited by I'm not sure if consciousness is "Fundamental" to reality, whatever it may be, but our biological apparatus is absolutely fundamental to the equation in which we are a part of. When you add consciousness to the equation you suddenly have the formula 0=1 and the dream begins. Consciousness is an emergent property from complex interactions of other properties. " All states in our consciousness depends directly or indirectly on states in the objective reality. In a sense, we are looking at ourselves. So, it would be helpful for everyone if you could say what you mean by "consciousness" in order to avoid confusion. Rather than saying atoms don't exist but waves do, it's more accurate to say that at a certain level of description it makes more sense to talk about atoms, whereas it makes more sense to talk about quantum fields at another level of description; at yet again another level of description it makes no sense to talk about atoms or waves, but agents with utility . As it stands now the question is equivalent to: if consciousness is fundamental, what happens if scientists prove it is not fundamental. " I'm surprised by the high numbers of "consciousness is fundamental". Consciousness stuff is subject to universal laws just like matter, so the experiences are shaped by these natural laws. | Instead of being a product of evolution, consciousness may be the fundamental aspect of the universe that made evolution and life possible in the first place. This is kind of a misconception. Was listening to Terence talk about oneness and multiplicity and was curious of this community’s thoughts. That is intentionality. Forget consciousness, there are much complex things if we forget about consciousness. The contents of the larger consciousness could also be changing, for instance say a Gaia like consciouness sees the whole earth changing. It is just that random assortments of things might randomly be conscious for indeterminate amounts of time for indeterminate reasons. The most compelling reason to think that consciousness is fundamental, IMO, is due to the hard problem of consciousness. A Reddit community for sharing and discussing science-based psychological material. All the 'minds' in the world, which we know through our personal experience, are singular. The challenge with asserting that consciousness is fundamental is getting across the immense chasm between fundamental consciousness, and the kind of consciousness we actually experience. ” Consciousness may allow us to exert top-down control or at least gain insight into why we act as we do. . Retreating to quoting passages from old dead guys. The idea goes back to antiquity—Plato took it seriously—and has had some prominent May 31, 2023 · Consciousness, our experience of being in the world, is one of the mind’s greatest mysteries, but as the neuroscientist Anil Seth explains to Steven Strogatz, research is making progress in understanding this elusive phenomenon. It challenges the notion of AI as mere algorithms and transistors, suggesting a kinship with the human condition through energy. As for whether consciousness would still be fundamental if it had never existed, my position is that consciousness is part of what it means to exist. The year was 1931. Awareness is, one could argue, the more "active" realization that this object (or ourselves) is present or in a certain condition. It is what happens when we homo sapiens do what we've evolved to do, with all the complexity, blinding speed, and raw processing power we have available to us. As part of consciousness the brain produce an experience that synthesize sensory input. There is nothing, but consciousness. Not only do many different aspects of mind count as conscious in some sense, each is also open to various respects in which it might be explained or modeled. This is why neuroscience, psychology, physics, chemistry, biology, history, sociology and anthropology to name a few disciplines all play a role in it's description. It is all about uplifting the individual consciousness that we are currently experiencing back/to Unity, where you get to experience all of it Tl;dr Consciousness is not an entity, or a fundamental force, or indeed the ground of all being (which in any case amounts to an epistemological claim, and not an ontological one). We are part of the universe, yet we look out at the universe. id imagine a human brain with no access to the standard senses wouldnt be able to form any high level of consciousness. Instead of physical reality being fundamental and giving rise to consciousness, the assumption is flipped to consciousness is fundamental and physical reality is derivative. Consciousness is expressed as the underlying source of existence known as the “field” and is infinite, boundless, limitless, timeless, all-knowing, ever-present, all-encompassing, yet, it’s non-local, space-less and non-personal. Is consciousness something nature accidentally stumbled across through the course of evolution and somehow became integrated into life or is consciousness a fundamental aspect of life and wherever there is life in the universe you are likely to find conscious life? Share Add a Comment Consciousness is the first person perspective. Well there's tons evidence that points to consciousness being emergent, and no evidence pointing to consciousness being fundamental. Things such as reincarnation/other realms are still pure speculation in this case - there's only the premise of continuation. But science aside, I think it's possible consciousness is on a complex spectrum in the universe. If consciousness is fundamental, but no conscious experience we thus far concretely know to exist is, I really don't know what you're calling fundamental aside from some completely conjectured notion of consciousness. r/philosophy • 48K subscribers in the consciousness community. Perhaps every element in this universe has consciousness to a degree, ligh The idea of consciousness being fundamental to reality. Members Online Space-time emerges from consciousness but not in the meta-physical way that proponents believe. Regardless, what I refer to as consciousness could still be the delayed product of the environment. But I think there is a whole scoop of thought that would back you up called Phenomenology. Vijñāna is an emergent property, but the nature or dharmatā of vijñāna is not emergent. So, fundamental laws can be modified, new existents can be necessary. "It plays on the concept that at the fundamental level, everything is energy and that consciousness is not just a byproduct but a central force. Consciousness, rather than being a fundamental or eternal aspect of our existence akin to a "soul," can be understood as a transient phenomenon arising from the intricate interplay of our anatomy and the electrical processes within our brains. " dark matter/dark energy: our present fundamental laws stay the same, new stuff is posited. Thank you That5HeadGuy for posting on r/consciousness, below are some general reminders for the OP and the r/consciousness community as a whole. But because they look the same they are sublated into one universe from the point of view of a fundamental consciousness that joins the two (just like the brain). instagram. Jesus Christ just get an actual degree in physics and you'll look back on this and laugh. Perhaps when the fundamental forces are perfectly balanced reality could go one way or the other - the multiverse I guess. This consciousness then continues to evolve over eons into evermore aware forms of conscious matter culminating at this point in the big bang as you. My eye twitches every time I read a quantified account of exactly how much silicon processing power is needed to simulate a human brain/mind (it's almost inevitably assumed that one is identical to the other) The term "consciousness" is used to express many different concepts. Members Online • truecrimetruelife . Reply reply I was on Philip Goff's side mostly, but I do agree with Sean Carroll that serious panpsychists should tell him how physics should be changed and if you say physics won't be changed then he is rightly not that interested because it won't change the world much. You've moved away from talking about consciousness and onto super special consciousness that can't be quantified because it's too special. This does not… Let’s assume consciousness emerges from a sufficiently complex system of interacting components. Other beings might have similar parts and processes as mine, and might even display outward signs of intelligence. The difference lies in the level of self-awareness and the manifestation of this consciousness. Consciousness is not like a bunch of fucking microscopic magnetic moments that become aligned in macroscopic objects to form a macroscopic magnetization, that's just silly. The issue is that the English term “consciousness” is generally used to translate vijñāna which is an afflicted and dualistic consciousness, and vijñāna is not fundamental, it is a byproduct of the causes and conditions of ignorance and grasping. " We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The statement is only half true. Consciousness creating understanding of an external world vs consciousness being more fundamental than the external world. This doesn’t mean that literally everything is conscious. It probably can't be classified as a fundamental force since we can't measure it. Welcome to r/AnomalousEvidence! A place for researchers and experiencers to discuss, share, and catalog a wide range of anomalous activity. It’s framework starts with consciousness (or the interaction of conscious agents) and produce spacetime. Consciousness is the universe's mechanism for ensuring that there isn't nothing. Throw in an attention mechanism that identifies the largest self need and isolates the relevant sensor inputs to satiate that need and you have a system that has consciousness like a human has consciousness. For instance, I could argue that a "mind" is merely an emergent property of a sufficiently complex network with a particular structural organization, and that from a sufficiently complex network "consciousness" is just a behaviour. Humans are matter with consciousness. We cannot remove ourselves from the equation any more than we can occupy space and be alive and self aware without this meatsuit that is affixed to our being. It seems that consciousness is fundamental to existence, because without it the singularity is just nothingness. This does not… 12 votes, 16 comments. A general reminder for the OP: please remember to include a TL; DR and to clarify what you mean by "consciousness" Do you believe consciousness is fundamental or something that must be created in order to experience reality? What role do you think conscious agents… Consciousness by defination means ability to recognise and respond at any level of organization (cellular to orgasnismic) to any environmental stimuli , Consciousness is both defining and fundamental property of all living. plato. Similarly, the consciousness in humans, animals, or even machines, if it comes to pass, arises from the same universal source. The Hindu story of creation explains how this ‘God/Consciousness’ might undergo the process of indivuation through a series of reductions, wherein the "It plays on the concept that at the fundamental level, everything is energy and that consciousness is not just a byproduct but a central force. A-Consciousness is your associative and analogical ability to comprehend your present world in terms of your past world. This seems to me a fundamental disagreement at the very starting point where the panpsychist takes for granted (for good reasons) that there is phenomenal consciousness and try to make place for it in a coherent manner even if that doesn't lead to "explaining" consciousness (the motivation isn't to explain it necessarily, but to make a place Consciousness being fundamental does not entail consciousness having a will. org/apertureFollow me!: https://www. Consciousness is not fundamental, but it appears that all living organisms, with enough time, will evolve consciousness, as consciousness is selected for because it better increases your odds at survival, so in that way it is probably universal to life (again, given enough time). If i had to guess from the replied/posts i've used to read i would have guessed 90% would reply "not fundamental". com/mcewen/Conscio If the world is primarily ideas, then the idea of fundamental consciousness completely recontextualizes self, reality, and the roles each play. To be conscious is to be present and have other things be present to us. It could even be supposed that consciousness is not merely a component of all matter, but that the material is actually the same as consciousness -- that consciousness is what is ultimately fundamental, generating its own mediums via its own abstractive information-processing (forming initial information perhaps as arbitrarily as we imagine the So, if consciousness fundamental, then it is "of central importance" and the "primary rule or principle on which something [in this case, all of physical reality] is based. Home to experienced apologists of both sides, biology professionals and casual observers, there is no sub with more comprehensive coverage on the subject. There can never be no conscious observers anywhere. If consciousness is fundamental, then it wouldn't matter what materials I'm made of or what physical processes I go through. Explanation: This perspective posits that consciousness is inherent to the fabric of the universe, akin to fundamental properties such as quantum fields. Consciousness is a fundamental truth. Researchers long assumed space and time were fundamental parts of reality and somehow consciousness emerged out of that. The task of understanding consciousness is an equally diverse project. That which exists is that which has an effect on consciousness. Our understanding of consciousness is only complete, when modelled as a basic building block, adhering to the laws of evolution highlighting the ‘birth, transformation, growth-maturity, decay and death’, of consciousness, together with ‘degrees of consciousness in all its transformation stages. Like the brain literally ensuring to breath. Consciousness is a system function to acquire energy and take specific actions to preserve the persistence of the self. A novel study reports the dynamics of consciousness may be understood by a newly developed conceptual and mathematical framework. You are literally, what your consciousness looks like when viewed from across a dissociative barrier. " Consciousness is a fundamental property of the universe and is neither physical nor mental and by being neither makes definition difficult through science alone. Instincts and choices don't require consciousness. This could mean developing ethical guidelines and principles that take into account the potential for AI systems to exhibit consciousness or awareness. We sure as hell didn't teach our brain to make us breath when we were born. Is consciousness a important part of the universe or just a lucky accident? • "Consciousness is a singular of which the plural is unknown. These components should have boundaries where, when their behavior falls within these boundaries it would be considered “normal behavior. The next evolution of human consciousness appears to be what some call enlightenment…or the point at which consciousness finally is able to become aware of itself. A baby is born with no understanding of objects, can’t even really see anything but light and shapes. Posted by u/Competitive_League46 - 5 votes and 25 comments I personally think consciousness is better explained as being fundamental. Emergence of consciousness doesn't require that consciousness have some special status, or souls exist, or anything like that, it only requires that the fundamental explanation of it be given in higher order terms. Given that DNA's structure wouldn't be discovered for 40+ years, and the frequent conflation of consciousness with souls and souls being the domain of religion, and the history of religion and science, it's no surprise that he would respond "Oh, hell no. If you change the word "consciousness" to "intelligence" in your post, then it works (sort of). If consciousness is fundamental, it’s fundamental, if not, it’s not. But there is the fundamental consciousness, and that is still there whether you are alive or not, and your consciousness is part of that bigger consciousness. If you're a panpsychist, you believe that fundamental pieces of consciousness reside in everything, from quarks on up to bees and humans, but only in more complex brains do you find consciousness unified enough to create experience like we have. Consciousness: The Fundamental RealitySign up and start learning for FREE: https://brilliant. If this were extensive rather than a random fact associated with consciousness then it would mean we know that objects without neural pathways cannot have consciousness. Sep 25, 2023 · The concept proposes that consciousness is a fundamental aspect of reality, like mass or electrical charge. A general reminder for the OP: please include a clearly marked & detailed summary in a comment on this post. " Can you elaborate on "a necessary relationship to the physical?" Cause think there are the two sides of the question, the mind is a purely nonphysical thing completely distinct from physical matter (Cartesian dualism), then there is the idea of the mind being something purely physical and not at all distinct Your added question contains a contradiction and needs to be revised. Consciousness is a fundamental property of the universe. The emergent properties argument requires the same amount of faith as consciousness being fundamental. This does not automatically include the practice of awareness or practice of being conscious. What is the argument for Consciousness changes -> Existence of larger consciousness? Maybe you mean contents of consciousness change (also lets bracket the issue of whether change requires a cause). It's that you're here, now. You could also say, on panpsychism, that physical matter is fundamental. This temporary nature of consciousness is underscored by the phenomena of near-death experiences (NDEs). Consciousness is the mechanism the universe uses to look at itself. If we want to identify the connection between quantum physics and consciousness, it's hard to see a way to "science" our way to an answer, with some exceptions like Orch-OR, though even that still doesn't seem to have any advantage over other consciousness theories when it comes to empirical evidence (so far). Article link below. Simulation theory gets into this. A place to discuss Sam Harris and to have difficult conversations with civility. One has to consider that consciousness may be fundamental to a particular universes ability to exist. Aug 11, 2022 · Consciousness can not simply be reduced to neural activity alone, researchers say. This is the essential problem I have with quantum mind proposals (and hypotheses that there are dominant quantum effects in the brain at scale) or other suggestions of some exotic computation model going on -- there's no accompanying reasoning of why the existence of some quantum coherence or the like would be necessary or even just a more compelling argument for consciousness, nor how the There are those that speculate that a rock has rock consciousness and a quark has quark consciousness. The universe consists of matter and humans are made of matter. Similarly, we only experience the universe through our consciousness. So bees are conscious but just maybe not in the same way we are. They are examples of "easy problems" of consciousness. Hoffman began with the assumption that consciousness itself, awareness, is fundamental, And all of what is observed emerged in consciousness, including time and space. This fundamental force of consciousness is what some people would call God. In other words, consciousness prevents the "paradox of nothingness". How does it do it. zjoyzhqpyeglhmjnrsvxwuskkjrhinfixylvotscwwrzlvcbucof